LAW Alternative Conceptions of Antidiscrimination
Criminal Law: White Collar Crime

All Directions
Criminal Law
White Collar Crime


Criminal Law: International Criminal Law & Immigration Law
[ A ] [ L ] [ R ]

Law School CoursesRelated Law Courses by TopicCourses Outside SLS by TopicClinic(s)ResourcesYour Network
169 items in this track |
Item is good for 31 routes, rollover orange dots above to see which ones! LAW 547 Alternative Conceptions of Antidiscrimination Law School Recommended for route(s): [ Academia ] [ Litigation ] [ Regulatory & Policy ] Criminal Law: White Collar Crime Why it is relevant for ... [ Academia ] [ Litigation ] [ Regulatory & Policy ] as a Related Elective for those interested in Antidiscrimination : Stereotyping and prejudice are factors that may influence the experience and outcome for members of a racial or ethnic minority or other protected class, especially when they enter a criminal justice system created by members of a different race, ethnicity or sexual orientation. Students should consider taking one or more courses focusing on this issue. General course Description: This course carefully examines traditional explanations of why profit-motivated actors (employers; sellers of goods and services) might discriminate against members of historically subordinated groups. It also surveys traditional ideas about why such subordinated groups might be disproportionately disempowered in the public, political sphere, and how we might identify which public decisions were discriminatory. It then looks in considerable detail at a variety of broader and narrower conceptions of what illegitimate discrimination is, conceptions that are more and less accepting of the legitimacy of “productivity-based” distribution of income, and “one person, one vote” views of democratic legitimacy. It explores the degree to which the antidiscrimination principle can be understood wholly individualistically, without reference to the existence of social groups and discusses a wide range of theories in which group subordination is more or less central to our understanding of illegitimate discrimination. It examines whether antidiscrimination law does or should be used as a “regulatory tax” to advance group ends, and if it is, how we do or should define the groups who are appropriate beneficiaries of such taxes and the groups that are appropriately burdened, and the degree to which antidiscrimination law should be viewed as a mechanism to counteract subordinating cultural practices. The course confronts these very basic, general issues in very specific legal contexts: for example, Title VII regulation of job testing; sexual harassment law; the ADA’s requirement that employers and owners of public accommodations make reasonable accommodations to disabled workers and patrons; IDEA’s requirement that disabled students receive a free, appropriate education in the least restrictive environment, and that disabled students not be disciplined if the conduct for which they would be disciplined is a manifestation of their disability; affirmative action admissions programs for universities; hate speech codes; and Title IX requirements that women athletes receive (roughly) equal resources to male athletes. Course Style: A Substantive course teaches the law, theory, and policy in a particular area of law Course Frequency: Varied, check w/ registrar |